Friday, April 19, 2019

United States trade policies and their effect on the automotive Essay

coupled States trade policies and their effect on the automotive industry - probe ExampleThe desolate outlook for the United States auto industry comes as no surprise for nearly everybody.In the beginning of 2006 fording Motor Company and General Motors, two of the Big Three automakers, announced reel readyoffs in the tens of thousands and debilitating year over year harmes in the billions of dollars. In addition to these layoffs, some(prenominal) General Motors and Ford have planned for multiple plant closures and the selling off of controlling shares of assets or subsidiaries in their ongoing struggle toward profitability. These announcements come as a blow to the tenuous economic retrieval of the United States.The recent trends regarding the economic recovery of the United States remains slow but promising. According to practice session Situations published by the U.S. Bureau of Labor and Statistics, the current average unemployment tramp for the United States is 4.7%, ( 2006). The effect the be massive job loss in the automotive industry will have on the unemployment rate and the overall health of the nations prudence is uncertain.In the four years between 2000 and 2003, an estimated 5.2 million people lost their jobs. everywhere 2 million of those lost jobs were in the manufacturing industry (Employment Situation, 2006). The cause for the ongoing declension in Americas auto industry are many and range from increasing fuel prices and the growth of the global economy to poor product design and increased unusual competition. Although all of these issues are contributing factors in the decline of the American auto industry, none are as contentiously argued as issues of United States trade policies. According to theatrical role 2102 Congressional Statement of Purpose on trade, there are 6 defining factors to U.S. Trade agreements (2003) To boost economic growth.Reduce or eliminate trade barriers. Trade 2The establishment of fair and exist inter national trade.Provide protection of American industry and labor against injurious import competitions.To open grocery store oppoutunites for U.S. commerce in non-market economies. To provide reasonable access of products too less developed countries or nations. In the process of attaining these goals U.S. trade polices have drawn harsh criticisms due to the nations 2005 trade deficit in fabricate goods of $726 billion and to the apparent effect they have on the U.S. economy, its labor force and worker rights and reward (Scott 2006).As the trade deficit in manufactured goods continues to rise, so too does the loss of jobs in the manufacturing industry. The United States finds itself uneffective to compete with low labor and production cost in foreign countries. For automakers such as Ford and General Motors, this has lead to the movement of production plants to outside the U.S. as well as the massive volumes of lay offs the industry is currently experiencing. The autoworkers th at have been fortunate enough to retain their jobs face the issue of the downward insistence on wages and benefits that is caused by the rising trade deficit and the lower labor costs in foreign countries.Currently, the cost of labor in Mexico is the lowest of any developed nation (Bernard). Labor costs are one of, if not the number one, highest expense of any corporation. While moving U.S. production plants to Mexico creates jobs, increases the ensample of living and stimulates the economy for that country, the U.S. labor force cannot compete with these low wages and benefits and therefore, lose bargaining power. The loss of bargaining power is exacerbated by the low level of government enforcement of labor laws in some foreign countries. In the United States this loss of bargaining power often results in the acceptance of lower wages and cuts to benefits and pension programs by U.S employees. Trade 3While jobs are being exported to foreign countries such as Mexico, auto parts ar e being imported to the United States at an increasing rate. In 2004, the United States imported $77 billion

No comments:

Post a Comment

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.